Milter-greylist

On 2013-08-30 18:05, Jim Klimov wrote:
> Now that I look at it, possibly the first half (test for existance
> of the ${OBJ_SEQ_FLAG}) is not quite needed, at least it might maybe
> interfere in the development cycle (i.e. just always touching and
> updating that file after a successful rebuild of prerequisites would
> be cleaner - otherwise the seq objects are rebuilt every time), but
> this is not fatal for dev, and of no consequence for users who build
> the program once.

Nay, tested it again - works as should, does not cause extra
recompilations of "sequential-only" files (although does call
MAKE_SEQ to find that there is nothing to rebuild).

Certainly should not touch the flag file as part of "obj-seq"
(after calling MAKESEQ) - this does force the resulting binary
to be older than its prerequisites and causes its rebuilds on
every call to make. In fact, removing the "test" also has the
same effect for me on both Sun and GNU make's.

In short - this part is re-tested to be correct... my memory
was vague about such details half a year after implementation
and tests ;)

//Jim Klimov