Jim Klimov <jimklimov@...> wrote:
> I wonder if it makes sense to test "spf self" with 127.0.0.1 for
> example, in case neither {if_addr} nor "localaddr" are set, instead
> of bailing out completely? After all, we are checking that the SPF
> is so loose it allows unexpected addresses?..
The spammer may use a domain that passes 127.0.0.1. It is less easy to
prepare a domain that will mathc the MX of all the target recipient.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@...Message
Re: [milter-greylist] SPF SELF without known local address
2013-08-12 by manu@...