Jim Klimov <jimklimov@...> wrote: > How is SPF processed in absence of "spf" rules or "nospf" keyword > in config? The manual is not quite clear on this default processing. IIRC, when you have SPF support compiled, SPF compliant message are whitelisted by default, except if: - you use the nospf keyword OR - you have any ACL with the spf clause I agree the default is a dumb choice, but changing default seems even dumber, as some people may rely on it. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@...
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] How is SPF processed in absence of keywords in config?
2013-08-11 by manu@...