On Mon, 21 May 2012, Greg Troxel wrote: > So there is the possibility of insisting on a new enough yacc at > configure time, and forcing bison as a dependency for solaris. This is > a tough call, having to separate what's behind vs. what's normal. > > Alternatively, posix says that yacc must support -b for prefix, so that > could be used instead. If Solaris doesn't conform to posix, I am > relatively unsympathetic and making Solaris people install bison seems > ok :-) Solaris yacc does support -b -- Leena Heino University of Tampere / Computer Centre ( liinu at uta.fi ) ( http://www.uta.fi/laitokset/tkk )
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] cannot build rpm on SMP machine
2012-05-21 by Leena Heino