Milter-greylist

compconsultant <Compconsultant@...> wrote:

> So, a suggestion was made long ago to hardcode something like 127.0.0.1.
> Is that not something that could be done to the code perhaps so us
> postfix users could then use this rule? If for some reason this is not a
> good option, how 'bout a randomly generated ip address that is valid
> being used instead, so, spf random?

It seems I missed that message. 
spf random seems a good idea, but it could have fake positive if you are
unlucky. What about adding an option to specify the address?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@...