Petar Bogdanovic <petar@...> wrote: > No, you didn't. What your change does is nothing more than passing the > buck to spamassassin which is way worse given how many lines of perl SA > pulls in its default configuration. RIght, I backed out the change, until we get a better idea of how to deal with that. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@...
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: [PATCH] Re: spamd checks hang when message contains
2010-06-22 by manu@netbsd.org