On 02/19/2010 05:36 AM, manu@... wrote: > > > Johann E. Klasek <johann@... <mailto:johann%40klasek.at>> wrote: > > > Not in general - this holds at least for Linux, NetBSD but not for > Solaris. > > Probably we must combine the check for a macro and existance of a > function ... > > > > #if (defined(HAVE_RES_NINIT) || defined(res_ninit)) > > #define HAVE_RESN 1 > > Ok, could people test this patch on Solaris and on other systems? > http://ftp.espci.fr/shadow/manu/resn.patch > <http://ftp.espci.fr/shadow/manu/resn.patch> is this patch against milter-greylist-4.2.3? Here it doesn't apply cleanly: # gpatch -p0 < resn.patch patching file Makefile Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. Hunk #2 FAILED at 30. Hunk #3 FAILED at 59. 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej patching file config.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 3. 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file config.h.rej patching file config.h.in patching file configure Hunk #1 succeeded at 726 (offset -2 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 4389 (offset -2 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 10098 (offset -104 lines). patching file configure.ac Hunk #3 succeeded at 745 with fuzz 1 (offset -33 lines). patching file dnsrbl.c patching file milter-greylist.spec Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file milter-greylist.spec.rej Didi
Message
Re: We need you for autoconf hacking (was: Re: [milter-greylist] memory consumption)
2010-02-19 by Dietmar Rieder
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.