Hi Petar, > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:15:25AM +1100, Michael Mansour wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > Am Donnerstag Januar 15 2009 01:49 schrieb Michael Mansour: > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I use uribl to score emails in SA. What I'd like to do is just drop > > > > > > any emails that exist in URIBL_BLACK (the blacklist category of > > > > > > uribl). > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm looking for a way to do this and am wondering if milter-greylist > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > do it? > > > > > > > > > > I don't think it can because a message needs to be accepted first, > > > > > > scanned to query the URI in it against multi.dnsbl.com and then > > > > > > perform an appropriate action. > > > > > > > > > > You used the word drop. Drop is easy. REJECT is hard. > > > > > > > > Hmm.. ok, how would I just drop these emails? > > > > > > > > I'm currently looking in SpamAssassin but it's basically a message filter > > > > and scorer, no drops. Checking SA 3rd party plugins also don't show any > > > > which drop. > > > > > > perhaps you would like to check out MIMEdefang? (www.mimedefang.org) > > > > Yeah I know about that but the thing I'm trying to avoid is accepting the > > emails for processing altogether. When my servers get hammered with 10 or 20 > > spams a second, processing that trash only to delete it wastes valuable > > resources. It's much better to handle it at the MTA and reject there, so as > > not to even process the trash. > > As long as you're doing checks against the message body, you are > processing the message. Just because the processing may take place > during the SMTP conversation, doesn't mean that it will claim less > resources. Hmm.. yes you're right. It only comes down then to the processing at the MTA being less than the processing done at the scanner. I use MailScanner which logs into a DB, so in my case doing this part at the MTA saves processing and mail logging down the road, but that may not be the case for others. Thanks and regards, Michael. > Petar Bogdanovic
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] blacklisting from uribl
2009-01-16 by Michael Mansour
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.