On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 06:38:33AM +0100, manu@... wrote: > Petar Bogdanovic <petar@...> wrote: > > > Patch is attached. Once applied, clients without a reverse dns mapping > > will trigger the SpamAssassin RDNS_NONE test. > > Sendmail logs are a bit different, and are inconsistent. Anyone has an > opinion whether this should be ifdef POSTFIX, or enabled for both > Postfix and Sendmail? It depends on what Sendmail passes to mlfi_connect(ctx, hostname, addr) as hostname. If it's the same like Postfix -- [some.ip.addr.ess] -- then enabling it for both MTAs would make no difference IMHO. I don't have Sendmail so I can't check this, but basically one just has to dig through the logs and find a Sendmail session with a no-rdns client. The interesting part are the milter-greylist lines then: milter-greylist: (unknown id): addr some.host.name[some.ip.addr.ess] (...)
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] clients without reverse dns mapping
2008-12-30 by Petar Bogdanovic
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.