Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > Seth Mos wrote: > > If however coupled with a lifetime like the autowhitelist, which was my > > original intention, that would make the best example of reducing the > > impact of grey listing in the enterprise. It would still however achieve > > very good results. > > > > Take my exmaple, apply a 10 day auto whitelist and suddenly it covers > > 95% of whitelisting all business communications. In a considerably sized > > company this reduces administration a lot without reducing the grey > > listing benefits. > > Isn't that case pretty much covered by the "lazyaw" > option in the configuration file? > However, if the total spam run takes longer than your greylist time, wouldn't that allow the messages through then? Or does lazyaw only trip off after a (IP, sender, receiver) tuple passes?
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Possible whitelist feature suggestion
2008-09-24 by Richard Frovarp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.