Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 07:24:52AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> > I find milter-greylist's auto-rereading a bit aggressive, and think it
> > might be better to just do that on SIGHUP like inetd and others.
> > Then one could "/etc/rc.d/milter-greylist reload" or ".. check".
>
> We cannot: the milter API says libmilter takes care of signals.
Just a small hint: Besides signals, there are other
ways for inter-process communication. For example
UNIX domain sockets, FIFOs, POSIX named semaphores
or SysV semaphores. Another, very simple way would
be to use an empty "flag file", which milter-greylist
uses to check the mtime instead of the actual conf
file.
However, all of that doesn't solve the real problem:
If the configuration file contains an error, milter-
greylist will terminate.
Best regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Gesch\ufffdftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht M\ufffdn-
chen, HRB 125758, Gesch\ufffdftsf\ufffdhrer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart
FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd
"C++ is the only current language making COBOL look good."
-- Bertrand MeyerMessage
Re: [milter-greylist] p0f support
2008-09-24 by Oliver Fromme
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.