Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@...> wrote: > manu> Instead of 127, what about using the maximum limits here? RFC 821 > manu> suggests 64 chars for mailbox and 64 chars for domain name. Plus the '@' > manu> and optionnal quotes around the mailbox, that makes 131. Was it > manu> obsoleted by a newer RFC? I recall a limit of 1024 on the domain name, > manu> but I can't find updated documentation. > > Yes, it is better to use the maximum limits instead of 127. However, > I'm not sure the value is. What is the limit in sendmail? > Because, error handling against malloc() in pending_get() is written > so. Sounds fine then. I'll commit that once we'll have found the maximum length of an e-mail address. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent le binaire et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas. manu@...
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] cutting off sender-string
2004-09-13 by manu@netbsd.org
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.