On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Manuel Badzong <manuel@...> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 02:30:43PM +0200, Akos Szalkai wrote: > >> But what's the use for greylisting after the data stage? Why not only >> accept or refuse (and perhaps temporarily black/whitelist the triplet)? > > At the data stage you could use various additional spam identifying methods besides > ip, sender and recipient. But if you identify it as spam with your "additional methods", don't you want to blacklist it then? What's the point to greylist (ask them to resend) if you already know it's spam? -- /peter
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] dacl greylist (...)
2008-09-15 by shuttlebox