Petar Bogdanovic <petar@...> wrote: > Returning 451 should be permitted after DATA so is there maybe another > technical reason for not allowing `greylist' in `dacl'? Well, the biggest difficulty is to define the proprer behavior: What should we store in the greylist for a multiple-recipient message? Would another message, with only some of the recipient, be considered as a re-expedition? What about if RCPT-stage ACL set speficy that some recipient should skip greylisting? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@...
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] dacl greylist (...)
2008-09-14 by manu@netbsd.org