Milter-greylist

Michael Mansour <mic@...> wrote:

> In terms of the DKIM returned status, from looking at the www.dkim.org site,
> it seems to me there's only two status, verified or unverified (pass or fail).

To which we need to add at least the "none" state (no DKIM header), and
perhaps "bogus" if the library returns an error.

And we would have such a clause:
dkim {none|bogus|signed|verified}

What library should we use? sendmail's dkim-milter has an internal
libdkim. Whould we import it or depend on it as an external software
package? Or use another library? Opinions?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@...