Milter-greylist

On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 06:55:06AM +0200, manu@... wrote:
> <attila.bruncsak@...> wrote:
> 
> > Dynamic memory allocation would be cleaner. No need to have 'magic numbers'
> > hardcoded.
> 
> Yes, it's planned for some day. Feel free to submit a patch for it.

i don't wont to break down a discussion 
about memory allocation here. my opinion is, that
32 characters is a little bit less. 
names ( first + family ) in austria can have 15 
till 20 characters.  sometimes up to 25 
also domain-names can have up to 20 characters.

so, for me is a very good solution with 64 chars.
if there should be an email-address 
with more than 64 char - ok kismet. 
but this will fit in more than 99.99 % 


best regards 
hans 

--