Milter-greylist

Sound good to me, but PLEASE drop some explanation comment in the
sources as well :-)
Ondrej

Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 06:48:55AM +0100, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > Well, that's more of an intended behaviour -- we want to use rcptcount
> > to blacklist spammers that send messages to possibly non-existing
> addresses,
> > and not valid cases where the recipients are actually good to go,
> right? :)
>
> Ok, so we want two counters: one for valid recipients, and one for
> attempted recipient. I wonder if we should also have tempfailed and
> rejected recipient count available as well. Opinions?
>
> It seems rcptcount will go deprecated and we will introduce new
> counter names. In order to avoid longer lines, I thought about that:
> ircount: input recipient count
> arcount: accepted recipient count (like old rcptcount)
> trcount: tempfail'ed recipient count
> rrcount: rejected recipient count
> nrcount: not accepted recipient count (trcount+rrcount)
>
> -- 
> Emmanuel Dreyfus
> manu@... <mailto:manu%40netbsd.org>
>
>