Constantine A. Murenin <mureninc@...> wrote: > The patch below is supposed to address this behaviour, although it > hasn't been tested in production as of yet. Does it look all right? There is one small problem: if real_rcpt returns tempfail or reject, you counted an addicitonnal recipient that does not exist. So your fix may improve the situation, but still contain a bug. I fail to understand what logic is to blame: in what situation the counter increasse in add_recipient hurts? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@...
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] unbreak 'rcptcount'
2008-07-28 by manu@netbsd.org