At 01:28 PM 9.6.2004 +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 21:42:32 +0200
>>>>>> manu@... said:
>
>> i use other milters that require just one line using
>> INPUT_MAIL_FILTER (like clamav), i wonder if this
>> could be done with greylist-milter to simplify
>> sendmail.mc configuration.
>
>manu> The other lines specify which sendmail macro should be made visible to
>manu> milter-greylist. If you remove them, you loose the queue id display in
>manu> the logs, the SMTP authentication, and other minor functionnality.
>
>I'm curious about this issue. Because, I'm using multiple milters on
>my server.
>
>As far as I read cf/README, most of the macros which miter-greylist
>explicitly requires are visible by default except {verify} of
>confMILTER_MACROS_HELO. So, I believe what we need to specify
>explicitly is only confMILTER_MACROS_HELO like follows to avoid side
>effect to other milters:
>
>define(`confMILTER_MACROS_HELO', `{verify}, {tls_version}, {cipher},
>{cipher_bits}, {cert_subject}, {cert_issuer}')
>
>Correct me if I'm wrong.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>--
>Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
I found I had to comment out the use of milter-greylist macros because I
had errors with them. The Sendmail-8.12.11 seemed to have everything needed
for GL. I remember comparing them, but I had so much trouble trying
milter-sender with its own set of macros, I may be confused.
Don't the stipulation of specific macros modify/replace those in the
defaults if not the same ones??
Which reminds me: Emmanuel, have you thought any more about adding the
callback feature to GL....??
I've given up on milter-sender -- plus, it calls for another database not
installed -- that's just too much trouble and still may not work (for me).
Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator
Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
jacks@...Message
Re: [milter-greylist] sendmail.mc setup
2004-09-06 by Jack L. Stone
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.