Adam Katz a \ufffdcrit : > Another potential feature would be to utilize SPF (though not blindly as > the milter-greylist option does) in the following manner: if > smtp.sender.com is listed in SPF, add all servers listed by SPF in the > autowhitelisting. This would solve the issue created by redundant smtp > servers (whose extreme case is exhibited by gmail as noted earlier). It's a great idea. That's exactly what I manually do from time to time, when I discover an ISP has changed his config and his new servers are not yet listed in dnswl: see if it has an SPF record, and if so take the IP listed and put it in my local whitelist. Of course the better way would be that such ISPs implement SRS, so their SPF would always validate, even when forwarding... And of course it's preferable to whitelist only "trusted" SPFs, ie not those who include "+all" and the like: this is what the "spf self" clause is meant for. -- Ce message a ete verifie par MailScanner pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de suspect n'a ete trouve.
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] greylisting delay sometimes in hours instead of minutes?
2008-03-11 by Benoit Branciard
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.