Hi Emmanuel, > Michael Mansour <mic@...> wrote: > > > Although I totally agree with what you say above, it's difficult to explain > > proper email practice to your clients that don't care to understand why their > > message was delayed by 16 hours. > > > > All they know is that their contacts email couldn't get through until 16 > > hours past, and when they were on their previous provider, that never used > > to happen. > > I must have misunderstood something: you are an ISP, and you have to > greylist your own clients? How does it works with casual users that have > a mail software that sends to your SMTP server? I'm a hosting provider yes, but I don't greylist my own clients, just greylist emails sent to their domains. There's plenty of spam each day that gets delayed by many hours, and by the time that spam does get through greylisting, the other filters pick them up and rate them for deletion (so the clients domain never gets them anyway). The problem is when a valid email gets delayed for an extended period of time, that's the thing which has caused me pain. It seems to be part of life for mail servers on the internet to be broken, not setup correctly, not follow RFC's, etc, which is why we manually whitelist, but from the clients point of view they just want their email to work and not be delayed (and they don't care about the fact that the sending mail server is broken), so such delays that cause them pain, cause me pain. This is why I've had to stop greylisting for some domains to keep the client happy. Ideally, I wish I could find an automated solution to have greylisting on while still not delaying valid emails, and having no administrative overhead. Regards, Michael. > -- > Emmanuel Dreyfus > http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz > manu@... > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Recommendation for static ADSL IP's
2008-03-01 by Michael Mansour
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.