Milter-greylist

At 08:04 PM 8.21.2004 +0200, milter@... wrote:
>Hi Jack,
>
>Quoting "Jack L. Stone" <jacks@...>:
>
>> At 08:00 AM 8.11.2004 +0200, manu@... wrote:
>> >Jack L. Stone <jacks@...> wrote:
>> >
>>
>> No more emails for a week+.... have I been unsubscribed...???
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jack L. Stone,
>> Administrator
>
>August means vacations ...
>I guess that Manu and the other milter-greylist users enjoy "real-life"
>a bit....
>
>I really long for a new stable release for milter-greylist
>(I havent' been bold enough to use 1.5.6).
>Been using 1.4 for some test sub-domains and it really rocks :
>I just received 3 spam in one week instead of 70-100 ones in my
>personal mailbox ....
>
>Feedback :
>- syslog(LOG_INFO, "%s: testmode: skipping greylist " in except.c
>generates too many syslog lines for people who restrict greylisting to
>some addresses/domains (-T). I feel it should be turned off by
>default.
>- I had to tweak a little the linux rc script for SUSE... When polished
>I will submit it back.
>- some (perl, shell) contrib statistics scripts in the tarball  would be
> nice so we can state clearly how many spam messages were not accepted ...
>- the addresses are shortened in the logs but I guess 1.5.x versions
>do not have this limitations
>
>Bravo to Manu and all who helped devised this nice software,
>
>SL/
>

Hi: Thanks for the reply! I was worried because I do enjoy this list and
this particular milter (plus milter-regex) has really relieved the load on
resources needed to run the other layers of spam tools. Now, I hardly ever
see spamassassin needed now and it soaks up the power!

I have been running v1.5.6 since the day it came out and no problems at all.

My platform is FBSD-4.10-p2

It is clear that the closer to the MTA "front door" we can get to catching
stuff, the better. I am really enjoying the "milters".

I too agree with your "bravo"....!!

Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator

Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
jacks@...