Alan Clifford wrote on Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:33:00 +0100 (BST): > As an example, if I used alan+20071007@..., it would be useful to > configure greylisting to be bypassed for, say, a couple of days after the > embedded date. But that's already what the program does. It whitelists for a couple of days (five by default I think) and if there's no more mail coming from that source it will remove it from the whitelist. Further, the whitelisting is *not* based on the to address but on the from,server tuple, so even if someone else uses that address later it will be subject to greylisting as it is *not* put in the whitelist. I can see some value in being able to use such a format "alan+20071007@" nevertheless, but then for *blacklisting*. Something like "do not accept mail to this date format marked address" if the date is x days later (or earlier). Kai -- Kai Sch\ufffdtzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Message
Re: {Disarmed} [milter-greylist] Time limited sutomatic whitelisting
2007-10-08 by Kai Schaetzl
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.