--- In milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com, Benoit Branciard
<benoit.branciard@...> wrote:
>
> Emmanuel Dreyfus a écrit :
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 09:17:41AM +0200, Benoit Branciard wrote:
> > > The "SoftFail" result indicates the sender host should not be
> > > authorized, but not as categorically as a "Fail". This is
matched bu a
> > > "~" entry in the SPF record. Cf.
> > http://www.openspf.org/RFC_4408#op-result.
> >
> > So SPF is "neutral" for the message, right?
>
> No, "Neutral" (?) and "SoftFail" (~) are different.
>
> "Neutral" is merely "I can't tell" and must be treated the same
way as
> "None" (no SPF record at all), whereas "SoftFail" is more
repressive
> ("it shouldn't")
>
SOFTFAIL is often used during testing.
JimMessage
{Disarmed} Re: {Disarmed} Re: [milter-greylist] Re: 4.0beta2 is available
2007-09-20 by Jim Hermann