Milter-greylist

Emmanuel Dreyfus a \ufffdcrit :
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 09:17:41AM +0200, Benoit Branciard wrote:
>  > The "SoftFail" result indicates the sender host should not be
>  > authorized, but not as categorically as a "Fail". This is matched bu a
>  > "~" entry in the SPF record. Cf. 
> http://www.openspf.org/RFC_4408#op-result. 
> 
> So SPF is "neutral" for the message, right?

No, "Neutral" (?) and "SoftFail" (~) are different.

"Neutral" is merely "I can't tell" and must be treated the same way as 
"None" (no SPF record at all), whereas "SoftFail" is more repressive 
("it shouldn't")