Oliver Fromme wrote on Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:00:35 +0200 (CEST): > No, the optimization is for the code generation backend. > So the resulting binary _might_ be slower. The difference > between -O2 and -O1 usually isn't large (I've even seen > programs that were actually faster with -O1), but -O0 is > often noticeably slower. Ok, I guess I will then just let it stay this way as I used O1. I can try that "compilatus interruptus" with the next 4.0 alpha build. Thanks! Kai -- Kai Sch\ufffdtzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Message
Re: {Disarmed} {Disarmed} [milter-greylist] OT: GeoIP compilation fails
2007-08-03 by Kai Schaetzl