Milter-greylist

Jason Bertoch <jason@...> wrote:

>       I can only think of one scenario where enabling lazyaw would hurt.
> If a server behind a NAT firewall first passes greylisting requirements,
> gets on the autowhitelist by IP alone via lazyaw, then another host behind
> the same firewall begins spewing directly.  By experience, is this common?

It can happen, and IMO it will happen more and more often, but your
experience can be much different than mine, depending who you are
exchanging mail with. That's why lazyaw is an option: enabling it is at
your choice and depend of your experience.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@...