manu@... wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Therefore, if there's any mentioning of such HELO-based > > filtering in the manpage or other docs, it should be > > accompanied by a fat warning, IMHO. So at least those > > who intentionally make their servers violate the RFCs > > are aware of it. > > Well, you can always enjoy the power of a nifty ACL without breaking > any RFC: > > racl greylist helo "localhost" delay 12h msg "Think about fixing HELO" > racl greylist default delay 30m Yes, that's right. :-) Although I doubt that it really helps. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Gesch\ufffdftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht M\ufffdn- chen, HRB 125758, Gesch\ufffdftsf\ufffdhrer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "Clear perl code is better than unclear awk code; but NOTHING comes close to unclear perl code" (taken from comp.lang.awk FAQ)
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Invalid helo strings check support?.
2007-06-20 by Oliver Fromme
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.