Milter-greylist

At 11:26 AM 8.1.2004 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello everyone
>
>I just integrated Hajimu Umemoto's patches to bring complete
>IPv6 support to milter-greylist. Version 1.5.4 is therefore a big change
>from version 1.5.3. I hope it will not introduce too much problems.
>Please test it and report anything wrong you encounter. 
>
>Now I have to integrate Cyril Guibourg's patch for MX sync bind address
>selection.
>
>-- 
>Emmanuel Dreyfus

Hi, Emmanuel. Thanks for the new version. Is IPv6 support the only change?
(don't need it myself - yet)

Also, when will this new one be in FBSD ports as I typically update/upgrade
from there?

Again, thanks for a great spam tool! By adding milter-greylist to the MTA
level of spam nets, I have cut spam that gets past the MTA to 2% from
previous 30% -- I was catching the 30% with Spamassassin & Procmail. Now, I
only need to invoke the use of heavier resources for the 2%.

Other skeptics have said "...well, just wait until the messages return from
retries...." Been using GL for about a month and don't see any rise of spam
getting past MTA in my stats.

That's why I was so interested in your new rcptfilter. BTW, it still gets
invoked, but doesn't snag anything, nor does it show any report of "abort"
as do the 3 other milters used.

I am reluctant to bother you as you did say "as is" ... but, what "Input
Filter" line are you using in sendmail.mc/cf...." The config file loads
okay so it sees that -- just ignores it.

Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator

Sage American
http://www.sage-american.com
jacks@...