Milter-greylist

George Elgin <gelgin@...> wrote:

> 51: acl whitelist list "my network"
> 86: acl greylist dnsrbl "SCORE" delay 2h
> 87: acl greylist dnsrbl "MCFADDEN" delay 2h
> 91: acl greylist dnsrbl "DYNABLOCK" delay 4h
> 93: acl greylist dnsrbl "DNSBLNJABL" delay 4h
> 123: acl greylist dnsrbl "SORBS-SPAM" delay 1h
> 126: acl greylist dnsrbl "SORBS-WEB" delay 1h
> 178: acl greylist dnsrbl "NOMOREFUN" delay 2h
> 181: acl greylist dnsrbl "unconfirmed" delay 2h
> 184: acl greylist sm_macro "maybe_forged" delay 8h

I'm interested by the dnsrbl definitions. 

It seems there is a missing data in order to discover what rule is
efficient. For instance, acl 184 gets 53/325 accept/tempfail, which
suggests a high rate of spam. But it could be a few legitimate messages
that are often retried. 

Do you think it would buy us something to keep record the the number of
delivery attempts before a message gets accepted?


-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@...