AIDA Shinra <shinra@...> wrote: > > That will obviously require a storage API for milter-greylist. It would > > be nice if that could be discussed here before a complete patch is done. > > Other people might have other strage plans, and having an API on which > > anything could plug-in would be better than hacking the thing over and > > over to add more storage back-ends. > Plug-in makes many problems. Milter-greylist is not such a big project > that benefits of plug-in architecture exceed costs. I'm not talking about having a directory of DSO implementing back-ends, just about defining the API between milter-greylist and the storage software. Making that in a clean way will not consume any performance, but it will help future developpement. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@...
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist 3.1.x branch and OpenBSD performance loading greylist.db
2007-01-08 by manu@netbsd.org