Techwolf <techwolf@...> wrote: > One of the most powerfull features of milter-greylist is that it > processes the mail before the data stage, saving a ton of bandwidth and > resources. Remember that in some areas, all the ISPs charge by the MB. > > If you decide to do this, at least have a ./configure --nodata I'm aware of that. There are two safeguards: 1) If you don't use header or body clauses in ACL, neither postmsg in an urlcheck definition, milter-greylist will not register header and body callbacks, and will just not see message content (just as it did before). 2) The maxpeek option can be used to tell milter-greylist to limit how much of the message milter-greylist will look at. e.g.: You can tell it to ignore anything beyond the 2048 bytes. > I like to have spf move from global to acl rules. spl for spl pass, > splfail for spl fail and splnone for server that don't have spl setup. Yes, we can do that. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz manu@...
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] planned features, call for volunteers
2007-01-05 by manu@netbsd.org
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.