On 12/7/06, Oliver Fromme <olli@...> wrote: > Now the problem: There's a backup MX (secondary) whose > sole purpose is to accept and spool mails if the primary > MX is down for some reason, and then send the queued stuff > to the primary when it's up again. The secondary doesn't > know about valis users on the primary, so it accepts _all_ > mails. Most of them is spam or spam-probes to non-existing > addresses. (Spammers seem to prefer secondaries even if the > primary MX is available ... Maybe they think that on backup > mail servers there are less anti-spam measures. Or maybe > they simply don't care about the MX priorities and send > their crap to a random MX.) > > Of course, what happens is this: As soon as the secondary > tries to relay the mails to the primary, it gets a "user > unknow" reply, which leads to a bounce message which is > either sent back to innocent people (because of forged > sender addresses) or stays in the mailq on the secondary > for a long time (because the bounce cannot be delivered to > the sender for various reasons). > > So the reuslt of the situation is that the secondary gets > a huge mail queue which is full of bounces that never will > be delivered (and expire after five days, generating post- > master mails). And furthermore, the seondary is sending > lots of bogus delivery errors to innocent people. > > Is there a _simple_ solution to solve the problem? Have you heard about the mailfromd sendmail milter? I haven't used it but it looks like it would do what you want. http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/projects/mailfromd/ Documentation: http://gray.gnu.org.ua/software/mailfromd/manual/ It looks like it does what you want. It seems to do the same thing as milter-ahead but it is free software. John
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Backup MX: verifying addresses
2006-12-09 by John Villalovos
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.