Milter-greylist

Dan Hollis <goemon@...> wrote:

> Is my per-recipient patch planned to get used? 
> Having something less than perfect is better than nothing at all, imo...

Sorry for the delay, I was attending a conference.

I generally agree that unperfect solutions are better than nothing, but
this solution has an impact on the config file. If we want to later
choose a better direction, we'll have to break backward compatibility on
the config file. That's something I really hate when being in the shoes
of an administrator, so I try to avoid doing it when I'm in the shoes of
a developper.

I'll work on that issue, but my time is scarce to work on
milter-greylist. I have two big pending patches, one with Hajimu UMEMOTO
for IPv6 support, and one with Cyril Guibourg for bind address selection
(Hi Cyril, bad news: the IPv6 patch breaks all our efforts on the bind
problem :o/ It solves some issues we had, however) 

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent 
le binaire et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas.
manu@...