At 09:38 PM 11.2.2006 +0100, you wrote: >Oliver Fromme <olli@...> wrote: > >> In order to change even a single pixel, the spammer would >> have to decompress the image, and then compress it again. >> That costs quite a bit of CPU resources, so I don't think >> they're doing that when sending millions of spam mails. > >I suspect they just build the image on the fly when sending spam. That >costs nearly nothing. > >> It might work on personal machines that receive only mail >> for one person, or maybe a few users. (Obviously that's >> already the case, see SpamAssassin + gocr.) But it won't >> work on large servers that receive mail (and spam) for >> hundreds or thousands of people. > >It's easy to scatter the job on several machines... > >-- >Emmanuel Dreyfus >http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz >manu@... > I don't know how this fits into the picture with MGL, but have you looked at the SA's alternative to the OCR? It seemed to me that the OCR used for SA had way too many working parts, and Dallas Engelken provided a image filter ruleset alternative that had done an excellent job of catching the image spams. None are getting through here. # ImageInfo Plugin for SpamAssassin # Version: 0.6 # Current Home: http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm#imageinfo # Created: 2006-08-02 # Modified: 2006-10-04 # By: Dallas Engelken <dallase@...> # # Changes: # 0.6 - fixed dems_ bug in image_size_range_ # 0.5 - added image_named and image_to_text_ratio # 0.4 - added image_size_exact and image_size_range # 0.3 - added jpeg support # 0.2 - optimized by theo # 0.1 - added gif/png support # # Files: # ImageInfo.pm (plugin) - http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins/ImageInfo.pm # imageinfo.cf (ruleset) - http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins/imageinfo.cf # (^_^) Happy trails, Jack L. Stone System Admin Sage-american
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] [off-topic] OCR milter?
2006-11-03 by Jack L. Stone
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.