On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 12:23:10PM -0400, Chris Hoogendyk wrote: > We are running milter-greylist-1.6 on Solaris 9 with Sendmail 8.13.6, > etc. on an E250 with dual sparc processors. > > We didn't go to milter-greylist-2.0.2 when building the system, because > we experienced what appeared to be memory leaks when trying to run it. > These seem to be in 1.6, but seemed to be worse in 2.0.2. Are you sure this is not a Solaris bug? Quoting from an e-mail which somebody sent to this list a while ago: Ok, I found the problem. Milter-greylist is innocent. It's a Solaris bug. Solaris 8 needs the 108827-40 patch (which has since then been obsoleted by 108993-39). There seem to be severe leaks in getaddrinfo() and friends in non-patched libpthread/libsocket/libnsl. Solaris 9 might require a similar patch. > If it can see that it has gone "to error state", why shouldn't it just > terminate on the spot? Does it think it will come out of error state? The "error state" message is printed out by "sendmail", not by "milter-greylist". Kind regards -- Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] [Fwd: watch-greylist]
2006-08-02 by Matthias Scheler
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.