Milter-greylist

Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@...> wrote:

> Okay.  Then, I think we have two choices:
> 
>   1) disable DNSRBL query against an IPv6 address
>   2) make our format for an IPv6 address
> 
> If we choose 2), I offer to use similar format with IPv6 PTR RR like:
> 
>   0.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.a.b.c.d.e.f.0.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.a.b.c.d.e.f.example.com.
> 
> If you like it, I'll implement it.

Well, what's the point of making a format, if we have no garantee that
people will follow the same path? I'd be in favor of handling IPv6 the
day it becomes useful and specified.

What do you think?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu@...