Milter-greylist

On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:23:10PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Oops, it was wrong.  Please throw my previous patch away and use this
> patch instead.  It seems working with this patch, here.

Checked in, with a few additionnal changes so that it builds...
I'll roll out 2.1.9 so that everyone can test with your patches easily.

> BTW, in current implementation, IPv6 address is also handled as same
> manner as IPv4 address.  Perhaps, it is wrong.  But, I have no idea
> how it should be handled.  Are there any specification around here for
> IPv6?

I'm not aware of any IPv6 DNSRBL...

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu@...