Yahoo Groups archive

Milter-greylist

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:32 UTC

Message

RE: [milter-greylist] new spam engines

2006-04-04 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int

> Headers show that the message come from DSL and cable pools, so IMO it's
> from a botnet. X-Greylist header reports that the sender retried only one
> time and after 5 minutes and a few seconds. My greylist delay is 5 mn, 
> so I wonder if this is a coincidence, or if the spam engine reads the
> text message in the SMTP reply that says "please come back in 00:05:00".
> 
> Do we have to face spam engine that implement resends? What is your 
> experience with that problem? 

Yes, it is 5 minutes and some seconds for me too.
I had on one minute greylist time,
increased now it to 6 minutes.
(by the way, would be nice to specify in second granularity)
Since I am in quite mode (not communicating the delay),
pretty sure that the spamware does not read the SMTP reply text.
Anyhow, the spamware retries now in double time (~10m20s).
I think nothing really to do. We expected this to happen.
It just costs a bit more to send the spam.

Bests,
Attila

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.