On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Oliver Fromme wrote: OF> OF> Is it possible _not_ to greylist those, but reject the OF> mails permanently (and immediately)? In other words, OF> a permanent "User unknow" should take precedence over OF> temporary greylisting. OF> I have a wild card entry in my sendmail's virtual user file (note I have added .example a few times in this post): @... error:550 "Spam problems. Try alan+newcontactone@..." which means I have to have separate entries for the names I actually use, like: alan@... alan lists@... alan milter-greylist doesn't leave any trace in the maillog for false addresses except, for example, when I sent one myself from my gmail account when it noted that the ip was in the exception list. But there is no entry in the greylist.db for the address I used. Something is not 100% right though, as the failure message delivered to my gamail account had error 553 in it rather than 550 but it appears to work anyway. Technical details of permanent failure: PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 9): 553 5.3.0 <falseaddress@...>... Spam problems. Try alan+newcontactone@... Looking at greylist.db, all the @... entries have a known local part. -- Alan ( Please do not email me AS WELL as replying to the list. Please address personal email to alan+1@ as lists@ is not read. A password autoresponder may be invoked if this email is very old. )
Message
Re: Greylist vs. unknown users
2006-01-20 by Alan Clifford
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.