Kai Schaetzl wrote on Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:02:14 +0100: > 3. I set the option "lazyaw". The tuples get still collected in > greylist.db although only the IP should be relevant now. So, it's not > clear if it uses IP only or the (IP, sender, recipient) tuple now. Same > goes for the X-Greylist header, it still says "whitelisted by" all three, > so it's not clear from there either. One observation regarding this. It seems that not all tuples get removed from the greylist once a server is whitelisted, f.i.: greylist.db:212.66.8.12 <emarlist@...> 1134412272 # 2005-12-12 19:31:12 greylist.db:212.66.8.12 <emarlist@...> 1134412274 # 2005-12-12 19:31:14 greylist.db:212.66.8.12 <konlist@...> 1134678152 AUTO # 2005-12-15 21:22:32 I removed the recipient's for privacy reasons. The last line moved to the autowhitelist, but the first two lines remained in the greylist although a message with exactly this tuple went thru later as autowhitelisted. So, lazyaw works for the server, but only the first tuple to "initiate" the whitelisting gets removed from the greylist. All other remain on it. Will they expire? Similar question: what happens with tuples that never try again. Will they eventually expire, f.i. after the default 72 hours expire for the autowhitelist? If not, the file will assemble a lot of garbage over time. Kai -- Kai Sch\ufffdtzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] A few questions
2005-12-12 by Kai Schaetzl
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.