Thanks for taking time to review my patch. It sounds like your notes about EXF_SPF could be the basis of "So you want to add <blah> support to milter-greylist"... However, I'm merely a user of milter-greylist, not a hacker of it, so I've only done enough to make my own pain go away. If the consensus is that having DRAC support is useful to others, then I'd appreciate having someone more conversant in milter-greylist integrate it in a manner consistent with the rest of the code. --- In milter-greylist@yahoogroups.com, Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu@n...> wrote: > 4) As I understand, milter-greylist is only a consumer of the DB > database. Anotehr process will feed it. What happens if we read while > the other process is writing? It looks like sendmail protects itself by using Berkeley style locking if available, fcntl locking otherwise. That looks like another autotools check to do it in milter-greylist. Not sure whether sendmail opens its DB files every time or just flips the lock on and off as needed. Romain
Message
Re: milter-greylist patch for DRAC
2005-11-28 by Romain Kang
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.