On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:47:27PM -0600, Ken Serrine wrote: >> To be flexible, this would all be more complicated, of course. We would >> want to minimize the number of LDAP lookups, I think. So, to cover all >> combinations of ACLs, I think we'd need options to determine if we just >> wanted "rcpt", or "domain", etc. >> In my case, if I only cared about "rcpt", then I wouldn't want the >> milter doing lookups for "domain", "from", etc. > It seems a pity to left the ability for users to greylist everything but > some DNS domains, IP block or sender combinaison. I can understand you > don't want to implement it now because it is of no interest for you yet, > but it would be good to decide of a LDAP directory structure that will > fit the complicated setup later. > I'm not knwoledgable in LDAP, so I cannot be of a lot of help. Is it > possible to query LDAP to retreive a whole branch of the tree? If it is > then we could fetch a set of ACL stored for a recipient. I think something more flexible would be to integrate lua support, so people can easily script support for mysql/ldap/abcxyz, with their own special site-specific rulesets. They can filter rcpt or domain or helo or any complex combination they like. -Dan
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] ldap support
2005-11-12 by Dan Hollis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.