On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 11:05:01AM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote: > > BTW: how difficult would it be to add a "acl" filter for the "HELO" parameter? > > I'm thinking of adding something like ... > > acl blacklist helo zhadum.de > > ... to my setup. > I feel the smell of bloatware :-) > An other approach would be to write a second milter, called milter-acl, > which would reuse milter-greylist's ACL code to only handle blacklist > and whitelist. > What are the benefit of having both functionnalities in the same milter? Less code redundancy Fewer points of failure (more daemons = more failure) Less memory usage (fewer daemons = less memory) More cpu efficient (fewer milters = less parsing the same message over and over) Fewer config files to mangle and maintain IMO milter-greylist could just be renamed milter-acl. It is already a complete acl system, only missing the blacklist feature. -Dan
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Using ACLs for blacklisting
2005-06-30 by Dan Hollis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.