>The solution you suggest is performed after the mail server accepted the >message. You want to delete a message from a mailbox because the sender is >in a blacklist. But if the blacklist is wrong, you delete a valid message >without a notification. Why is notification impossible when deleting previously accepted messages as I suggested? Why not: - ISP receives a message for user - sender address appears on blacklist an hour later - ISP rejects THEN, with notification Also, if you're assuming the blacklist is unreliable, then why did you write: >I'd rather see [black list filtering done] at the MUA (Mail User Agent, >outlook express in your case) level. I also don't understand why automatically updated blacklists should generally be unreliable. When do legit addresses send email to honeypot addresses?
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Use real-time black lists *retroactively*!
2005-03-14 by Uriel Wittenberg