On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 manu@... wrote: > Usually, this is caused by that: > Mail A arrives from (IP, from, rcpt) at time t > Mail B arrives from (IP, from, rcpt) at time t+23 > Mail A arrives from (IP, from, rcpt) at time t+24 > > B is tagged as being 23 hours late. > A is tagged as being not delayed > > There is nothing we can do about that. Except maybe adding the > Message-Id in the tuple? > Thanks for the explanation. I wouldn't like to comment on the message-id proposal as I haven't had much experience using greylisting yet. Or maybe I will. The example came from gmail which uses lots of ip addresses. If one put in the message-id, gmail's cycle through many ip numbers would have to be done for each email. Would that be a good thing? -- Alan ( Please do not email me AS WELL as replying to the list. Please address personal email to alan+1@ as lists@ is not read. A password autoresponder may be invoked if this email is very old. )
Message
Re: [milter-greylist] Delay calculation
2005-03-12 by Alan Clifford
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.