Question, is there a reason the regcomp calls in acl.c do not use the
REG_EXTENDED flag?
I'm kind of used to modern extended regex syntax including things like ?
and + that are not supported in basic posix regexes. I'm also not used to
the "backwards" behavior of \( and \{ in basic regex, something which
caused one of my rules to not match correctly.
I've since patched my copy of acl.c and recompiled, but I'm wondering if
there was a reason to specifically use basic regex, a standard which even
according to posix is obsolete and only exists for backward compatibility,
instead of the more modern extended syntax.Message
Why the use of basic regexes instead of extended?
2005-03-11 by Matt Kettler