Lpc2000

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Dominic Rath <Dominic.Rath@...> wrote:
>
> On Monday 24 April 2006 11:16, John Heenan wrote:
> > Here are the first eight instructions on my LPC2148, including the
> > first five which have nothing to do with disconnecting the JTAG port.
> >
> Exactly - either because of different bootloader versions, or
because Jaya 
> mixed up LPC2148 and LPC229x bootloader code. But as it really
doesn't matter 
> if disabling JTAG is the first or the third thing, I don't think
it's worth 
> discussing this any further.

The information I presented relates to boot loader version 2.1 and
which had the part identifier in ROM coded as 0x0002ff25.

The sender claimed that this dump was from 2148 part but that it
responds as 2138 part, and that this behaviour is well documented in
the Keil web site.

I agree it does not matter which particular part is.

> I'd prefer not to make this personal, but yes, I don't think it's a
good idea 
> when he keeps asserting that CRP could be broken using JTAG before the 
> bootloader had a chance to disable it.

I try to refrain from responding when an expressed opinion is taken so
personally.  In this case I wanted to take this opportunity to thank
for chipping in to clarify matters the way you have.

Jaya