Korg Poly800/EX800 Users group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Korg Poly800/EX800 Users

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:27 UTC

Message

Re: [korgpolyex] Is it a real polysynth?

2013-08-22 by Daniel Forró

Probably because all voices share one filter, and because saw wave is  
not real saw wave here, but only its approximation from the mix of  
four square waves. This all makes it sound "cheap" and thin even in  
the comparison with Korg Polysix or Poly 61, and it can't be compared  
with the other synths of those times with more typical  "analog" sound  
- Roland Juno 60, Juno 106, JX3P, later JX8P, JX10, MKS70...

This doesn't mean at all it's a bad synth. It has it's own character  
and identity. But if I should decide if P800 or DX7, second one is a  
winner :-) The only problem with desert island is the missing electric  
power... so ukulele or recorder would be better.

Daniel Forro


On 22 Aug, 2013, at 7:49 PM, Jason Adkins wrote:

> I cannot understand why certain people say the poly 800 is not a real
> polysynth over 50.000 couldn't care less, My favourite patch is the
> one with the Japanese percussion and the string coming in
> underneath,if it isn't a true polysynth I couldn't care less too,If I
> was on a desert island with a generator I'd rather have the Poly800
> than an FM synth.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.