Korg Poly800/EX800 Users

I can vouch for that. The Moog Slayer, 12/24db filter switch, and FM-800 mods all work great with the Hawk-800 in my Mark II. If you need any help or have any detailed questions feel free to email me.
Fran
--- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, Michael Hawkins <korgpolyex800@...> wrote:
>
> HI Tim,
> 
> as Everett points out, I have several customers that installed the HAWK-800 and AtomaHawk into their already moog slayer modified Poly-800's.
> 
> Both upgrade kits were designed to be installed without disturbing an existing moog slayer mod.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: tim.tashpulatov <tim.tashpulatov@...>
> To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Fri, April 9, 2010 1:35:27 AM
> Subject: [korgpolyex] Re: Moog Slayer pots question
> 
>   
> Mike,
> 
> Thank you for clarification. Does it mean that upon installing HAWK800 upgrade one no longer could use Moog Slayer mod?
> 
> --- In korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com, Michael Hawkins <korgpolyex800@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > Tim,
> > 
> > The HAWK-800 and AtomaHawk kits combined control Moog Slayer (which is really just extreme resonance).
> > 
> > But no, the Moog Slayer pots do not need to be three wire.
> > 
> > Mike
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ____________ _________ _________ __
> > From: tim.tashpulatov <tim.tashpulatov@ ...>
> > To: korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com
> > Sent: Thu, April 8, 2010 5:16:32 AM
> > Subject: [korgpolyex] Moog Slayer pots question
> > 
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I wonder if the two pots for the Moog Slayer mod should really be of 3-pin type.
> > 
> > My point is that I've got a digital resistor chip from AD, and it features two channels (or 'digital pots'). One has 3 pins, and the other is 2-pin only. The idea was to use this chip to control the Moog Slayer parameters programmatically.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> >
>